On 02/27/2015 03:02 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Laszlo Papp wrote:
I doubt that this assertion in the Qt and especially the KDE community
to be honest.
You're missing one very big and important point: this isn't about the Qt
and the KDE community. This is about the Krita user community, which a
totally different group of people.
Boudewijn
Yes, it's about the Krita user community. And it could also apply for
users of other KDE technology. But to your point...it's about users.
I am primarily a KDE technology user. Being somewhat not-technical, I
often have questions that this kind of capability would serve well. On
top of that, I am one of the local "KDE Experts", dealing with users who
have even less technical savvy. It would be wonderful to have a place
for these people's questions.
Both osqa.net/ and lampcms.com/ would work for the users I know about.
I'm slightly in favor of lampCMS rather than the freemium
OSQA/AnswerHub. Depends if the paid version has features we need and
can't get otherwise.
Boud asks, "What's the next step?". Two viable candidates have been
proposed. It should be a simple matter for some smart, committed people
to decide. And there should be input from the KDE SysAdmin team as they
would implement on the KDE infrastructure.
Carl
_______________________________________________
kde-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
