On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek <[email protected]> wrote: > 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my > proposal. > Is anyone against an *opt-in* possibility of enabling Issues and/or > Pull Requests for a given mirrored repo? Opt-in by maintainer of the > patches. We can easily draft a policy if someone is afraid. >
+1 for pull requests on an opt-in basis. > > Until we have "free" bountysource-like infra, I do need github Issues. > I also work with bountysource so they find a way to better support > bugs.kde.org; for now one can paste the url and it works but issues > "for adoption" are not listed. For me this seems reasonable. Since we are lacking support for Bounty Source and a particular maintainer wants/needs it, they should be able to use a custom solution until it is provided. It depends on our end goal: creating free software or creating free software with only free tools? If it is the latter then I fear we have already failed since many of us use additional tools to aid development which are not free. -- Vishesh Handa _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
