El Divendres, 18 de setembre de 2015, a les 23:43:34, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2. Regarding the issues/pull requests - nobody agreed/disagreed to my > > proposal. Is anyone against an *opt-in* possibility of enabling Issues > > and/or Pull Requests for a given mirrored repo? Opt-in by maintainer of > > the patches. We can easily draft a policy if someone is afraid. > > +1 for pull requests on an opt-in basis. > > > Until we have "free" bountysource-like infra, I do need github Issues. > > I also work with bountysource so they find a way to better support > > bugs.kde.org; for now one can paste the url and it works but issues > > "for adoption" are not listed. > > For me this seems reasonable. Since we are lacking support for Bounty > Source and a particular maintainer wants/needs it, they should be able > to use a custom solution until it is provided.
I don't think the fact that exactly one developer wants to use a non free service should influence our common mirroring setup, yes remember this is a mirror. > It depends on our end goal: creating free software or creating free > software with only free tools? If it is the latter then I fear we have > already failed since many of us use additional tools to aid > development which are not free. You do use non free tools, but KDE doesn't recommend nor bless them in any way, this would be quite a departure from that setup. Cheers, Albert > > -- > Vishesh Handa > _______________________________________________ > kde-community mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
