On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 11:15:38 PM CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 20:37:29 Lydia Pintscher wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Alexander Dymo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Lydia Pintscher <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> The technology is something that does not belong into the vision. > > > > > > Why? It would be strange for the tech organization/community like KDE, > > > IMHO of course. > > > > You cut off the part of my email with the reasoning: "It can go into > > the mission statement because it is a part of how we get to where we > > want to go. It is not the place we want to go." Or in other words it > > is too specific for a vision. > > To me, this vision draft presented here is also very broad. > Actually I think that only very few Free software projects would disagree to > it. I mean, it is not too different from the ideas which motivate the GPL.
Personally I like that. I think it's awesome if we have a vision which would in extrem allow GNOME to say, hey let's join KDE. > Do you have already a "mission" draft at hand, so it becomes more clear > what you have in mind ? Maybe first vision then mission? Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
