2016-09-20 16:30 GMT-03:00 Jaroslaw Staniek <stan...@kde.org>: > > > On 20 September 2016 at 21:19, Thomas Pfeiffer <thomas.pfeif...@kde.org> > wrote: >> >> On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: >>> >>> 2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org>: >>>> >>>> Added: >>>> ''Applications which are intended to be run on a server'' can be >>>> licenced under the GNU AGPL 3.0 or later >>>> Rationale: KDE Store code is under AGPL >>>> Question: should this be an option or a requirement for server software? >>> >>> I agree with this change, but I think it should remain an option. >> >> >> I would support making it mandatory, actually, or at least recommended, >> because for an end user a web service based on GPL software is no better >> than one based on proprietary software, because they cannot tell what >> software it is they're interacting with. Therefore, the AGPL closes an >> important hole in FOSS web services. >> >> I don't feel very strongly about this, but to me it would make sense to at >> least recommend AGPL for web software we produce. >> > > I see that too but also aren't we also limited here in one case: when our > LGPL software is usable for services? What can we do with e.g. KF5? Move it > to AGPL and add linking exception? > > Sorry if that's already solved some way.
AGPL code can use GPL and LGPL libraries. -- Nicolás