Am 2017-06-13 15:29, schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
On dinsdag 13 juni 2017 14:16:25 CEST Kenny Coyle wrote:
Thanks for putting this together, I can only see it being positive
going
forward.
The text itself is very clear and concise.
On the last section about promoting development, I'm wondering if it's
worthwhile having a statement about the infrastructure that KDE
maintains
and develops? How about the following:
To promote the development of Free and Open-Source Software, KDE
…
maintains reliable technical infrastructure to support the community,
evolving with the community
I think that fits well into the strategy part. I wonder if we should
explicitely mention that we want this infrastructure to be based on
Free
software and open standards as much as possible, since that's come up
over and
over again in the past when we discussed important infrastructural
changes.
(Own git vs. github, phabricator vs. other tools, etc.)
What do others think about this?
+1 on that. I just wanted to write a mail that I would like to have a
point for that like:
KDE is a living example for usage of free software and uses wherever
possible free products over proprietary in its own infrastructure
Cheers
Martin
