El dimarts, 4 de juliol de 2017, a les 23:04:08 CEST, Christian Mollekopf va escriure: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017, at 01:20 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > The applications lifecycle policy needs an update > > > > Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? > > > > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle/Draft > > Looks good to me for what it currently is. > > In general I think: > * it should be ok to release from playground for years, or even > potentially forever.
Why? > * going to extragear/applications should be an extra quality badge where > you sign up for certain requirements (which is why I think it should be > possible to release from extragear forever. Perhaps some project is just > not interested in translations for instance...) If you're not interested in translations you don't belong into KDE. Translations are a core of our user friendlyness declaration. Cheers, Albert > * Abolishing the extragear/applications differentiation at this level > would make more sense to me (extragear does have a second class feel to > it), instead applications should just declare that they are part of the > applications release. This would indeed also ease transitioning between > releases and dealing with the versioning should be up to the maintainers > (of course versions that go down are not at all something that should be > accepted ever anywhere). > > Cheers, > Christian
