On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 12:06:50 AM CEST Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Tuesday 04 July 2017 23:34:20 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > > What I meant to propose was more that instead of being initially in a > > temporary location, > > and then having to choose one of "proper" ones and go through review, > > we would instead > > start with a permanent location and then you "could" become part of a > > release with requirements > > and therefore review. In general I just think the barrier to release a > > project from KDE infrastructure > > should be lowered not raised. > > To me this sounds as if you want the KDE infrastructure to become a > dumping ground for low-quality, untranslated stuff, i.e. just like > github except with the KDE badge. Yes, I'm exaggerating, but essentially > that's how I understand what you are saying. > > I agree with Albert, Ben, and Luigi, that we (at least the four of us) > don't want this.
+1 -- Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de http://milianw.de