On 5 July 2017 at 14:11, Jonathan Riddell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 July 2017 at 13:04, Jaroslaw Staniek <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why not? I can imagine we can make the process more dynamic. > > Whole apps or their parts can go back to being maintained, what seems to > be > > a core property of FOSS. > > > > If so how about back-arrow from Unmaintained? > > Probably not worth making the diagram more complex but I added in this > sentence to unmaintained section > > "Projects can move back to an earlier stage if they are picked up for > maintenance again. " > > Thanks, I'd think not "earlier stage" but explicitly "playground" because in the meantime the unmaintained project might lost its "reviewed" stamp. Technology and other requirements move forward. Example: unmaintained project XYZ got restored from Qt4 times to Qt6, needs major changes for translation and build systems.
-- regards, Jaroslaw Staniek KDE: : A world-wide network of software engineers, artists, writers, translators : and facilitators committed to Free Software development - http://kde.org Calligra Suite: : A graphic art and office suite - http://calligra.org Kexi: : A visual database apps builder - http://calligra.org/kexi Qt Certified Specialist: : http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek
