I've seen a lot of people on Reddit and various chat rooms who are a fan of Kt as a name.
- It fits well in a square, which makes it great for logos. - It's unusual, but not weird looking. - It looks kind of like an element on a periodic table. - In Google and DuckDuckGo searches for "kt", most things on the first page were pretty obscure and unrelated to software. - kT is used in a lot of plasma parameters. - The K-T extinction event was the end of a previous era and the beginning of our era. - Kt is tool kit backwards. - Katie could become the mascot for Kt. On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 8:55 AM Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On donderdag 9 april 2020 14:12:36 CEST Clemens Toennies wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2020 11:34, "Jens" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hosting of the website also wouldn't be an issue (and if it ends up > > > > being high traffic, as long as the content is cacheable we can rely on > > > > Cloudflare). People would need to step up to write the content and > > > > produce any necessary graphics though :) > [...] > > > "I will happily make graphics" > > > > Regarding website/domain/url/graphics: > > What potential names would be allowed? > > Is anything with "Qt" in it legal or would everything need to be renamed? > > https://www.qt.io/trademark/ > > Qt's trademark policy is unsurprisingly strict, and it seems well managed on > top of that. A fork of Qt has to be make a clear distinction in its name, and > "anything with Qt in it" will be as misleading as marketing your os as "The > Windows Alternative". > > A fork of Qt would need a new name and its own branding. > -- > sebas > > http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org > >
