On Tuesday, 3 August 2021 10:14:06 CEST Kenny Duffus wrote: > On Thursday, 21 February 2019 15:21:28 BST Eike Hein wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the e.V. board will definitely discuss this issue as well in this week's > > call, to put some thought into the legal side vis-a-vis GDPR compliance. > > I think the community will here is clear and non-controversial, we > > collectively just need to think about how to do it properly. We'll > > report back our findings. > > > > Anyone who has something to contribute (GDPR experts in the audience?), > > please speak up of course. > > What were the Board's findings?
I'll quote from the "Board call notes 01/03/2019" mail to the e.V. membership
(so it did not go to -community, but ended up in the private list):
"""
Matrix min age check box / GDPR compliance
We're ok with removing the limit since we are already exposed to
that risk anyway in many other places
"""
and a week later (08/03/2019)
"""
* Matrix age consent
* We will send an email to ask them to remove it for now
"""
I presume that that (sending email) was done; there was no further follow-up
on the community (public) or membership (private) lists that I can see.
[ade] (balancing between "that's a private list, no quoting" and actually
wanting to answer the question)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
