On 01.02.11 19:49:10, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Dimarts, 1 de febrer de 2011, Ian Monroe va escriure: > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 21:19, Aaron J. Seigo <ase...@kde.org> wrote: > > >[snip] > > > > > > oh well, KTextEditor isn't an option, > > > > Should we give up so easily on this? The whole point of modularization > > is to remove cross-module dependencies, just like KHTML depending on > > KTextEditor. Ideally this sort of "sideways" dependency wouldn't > > exist. > > What is your ideal then? Writing KTextEditor in KHTML again since we can not > depend on it? Or using a worse component?
No, the natural fix is to make the dependency chain proper, i.e. KTE depends on kdelibs, khtml depends on KTE+kdelibs. That means khtml cannot be part of kdelibs anymore if KTE is not part of kdelibs anymore. Andreas -- You are confused; but this is your normal state.
