On 2/1/11, Andreas Pakulat <ap...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 01.02.11 19:49:10, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> No, the natural fix is to make the dependency chain proper, i.e. KTE > depends on kdelibs, khtml depends on KTE+kdelibs. That means khtml > cannot be part of kdelibs anymore if KTE is not part of kdelibs anymore. Funny, I would think the proper fix would be for people who put their work into kdelibs to honor the requisite commitment to backwards compatibility, rather than to punish other libraries for doing the right thing in using existing facilities.