Am Dienstag, 23. August 2011, 08:15:50 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > On Monday, August 22, 2011 11:33:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote: > > Was this decided upon at some point? I got conflicting stories > > fromsysadmin and other developers. Yesterday after migrating > > kdeaccessibilityto git I was asked by a sysadmin to rename the X.Y > > branches to KDE/X.Y Ithink > > personally, i prefer the KDE/X.Y style as well; and as we haven't had more > accidently pushes of X.Y branches as people have become accustomed to the > git tools more, the original reason for suggesting to move away from > KDE/X.Y to just X.Y seems to have gone away?
I also prefer the KDE/x.y scheme. The reason is rather simple: if a popular application (let's say Amarok) which has a well-known version number that differs from the KDE version number decides to release together with the KDE SC one could simply do 2 tags: a.b for the application version and KDE/x.y for the corresponding KDE SC version. In fact I wonder if it wouldn't be a good idea to do this for things that are part of the SC anyway, e.g. throw some tags for the KGpg version numbers in that scheme too. Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
