Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> > >> > No branches should be prefixed with "KDE"; we consider that a reserved >> > name. >> > Nor topic should branches be numeric in nature (such as a version >> > number) as >> > those are reserved for actual release branches. (Sys admin at the >> > meeting indicated that it is likely they will eventually put a push >> > hook in place that >> > prevents such "incorrectly" named branches.) >> >> Was this decided upon at some point? I got conflicting stories from >> sysadmin and other developers. Yesterday after migrating >> kdeaccessibility to git I was asked by a sysadmin to rename the X.Y >> branches to KDE/X.Y I think concensus and consistency are important >> here. Was there a decision that the official branches should be named >> X.Y? > > My vote goes to "KDE/X.Y", it is clearer what it means.
When the frameworks get split out into multiple repos, will they still use branch names KDE/5.0? What will that mean? Or will we come up with another scheme then? Thanks, Steve.
