On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:00:56 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Friday, August 26, 2011 12:06:26 Stephen Kelly wrote: > > >> Was this decided upon at some point? I got conflicting stories from > > >> sysadmin and other developers. Yesterday after migrating > > >> kdeaccessibility to git I was asked by a sysadmin to rename the X.Y > > >> branches to KDE/X.Y I think concensus and consistency are important > > >> here. Was there a decision that the official branches should be named > > >> X.Y? > > > > > > My vote goes to "KDE/X.Y", it is clearer what it means. > > > > When the frameworks get split out into multiple repos, will they still > > use branch names KDE/5.0? What will that mean? Or will we come up with > > another scheme then? > > I think they should, here's my reasoning:
Including the "5" ? http://vizzzion.org/blog/2011/06/there-is-no-kde5/ ;-) Alex
