On Saturday 01 October 2011 20:07:12 Stefan Majewsky wrote: > Actually I'm confused by the concept of activities as a whole: On > one hand, there are libraries now for reacting to activity switching. > On the other hand, activities are said to include running > applications, so apps will be closed when switching to a different > activity. That seems contradictory. > > That makes it difficult for me to see where power profiles come into > this game: Does this mean that when I want to switch to a different > profile, does this mean that I have to create a new activity when I > want to change to a different power profile, which would mean that all > running applications would close because they belong to the previous > activity?
OT question about activities: how can they manage stop/restart of applications inside them? What about eg singletons? About Power Management; having the ability to manage the 3 main profiles is everything I need. So, having an easier way to do it is an improvement for the users, IMHO. I don't have a clear idea about activities, as I'm not used to. But the idea expressed in your mail makes sense to me. So, +1 from here. Cheers, -- Andrea Diamantini, adjam GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org IRC: rekonq@freenode
