On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Thomas Zander <[email protected]> wrote: >> The part that I think is confusing is to make is so that one changes the >> way power management works in some cases so that it's not in power >> management. It's going to confuse approximately everyone who cares that is >> not a KDE devloper. It may be that few enough people care that aren't >> involved in KDE development that that's OK, but this is really >> counter-intuitive. > > I think nobody here is going to tell you that its indeed change, there will be > a change in what some people need to do. Hell, you might even have to start > using activities! But its good change, change that makes the mental load less > after the initial hump. > > At the same time it should be stressed that if you don't have any advanced- > power management requirements, the only change you will notice is that you > need to care even less about the power management as more is done > automatically for you.
I don't think anyone is suggesting we shouldn't allow users to tie power management to activities. I think the point is we shouldn't require it. Of course integrating the power management with activites make sense, but I don't think making that the only way to configure your power profiles makes sense. That is the point of disagreement here. -Todd
