>2011/11/17 Andras Mantia <aman...@kde.org>: > On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:17:30 Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> > i was not sure i agreed with that approach, but i have to say that >> > the last few threads on this topic on k-c-d have supported their >> > point :( >> I would draw exactly the opposite conclusion. >> >> If the signal to noise ratio here is considered too low, then having >> the KF5 discussions here >> * would have increased the signal, and thereby increased the SNR >> * IMO would also have decreased the feeled need for the lengthy >> discussions taking place now, since people would feel better >> informed, which would decrease the noise, thereby increasing the SNR >> >> Seriously, IMO it's a "bug" if the core KDE developers don't use >> kde-core- devel for communication. > > Exactly. Frameworks is the *core* of KDE. What is kde-core-devel then? > >> P.S. from my POV, I'm not sure using kde-core-devel for the >> reviewboard mails is really necessary > > This is questionable, as those mails are about kdelibs patches, no? > Think about those as what they are: contributions to kdelibs that need a > discussion. Like in the old days, when you'd post a patch to a mailing > list.
True, but then shouldnn't those interested in reviewboard patches go read what's on the reviewboard? > > Andras >