On Friday 23 March 2012 9:17:43 AM Chusslove Illich wrote: > > [: Allen Winter :] > > Personally, I have put a lot of time and effort into adding KUIT into my > > projects over the years and think it is a great help, even if just for the > > developers to understand how the strings are being used. > > I hope we had a small misunderstanding here. David's earlier message was > precisely to clear that up. > > What I want to remove are only in-text tags (like <filename>, <emphasis>, > etc). In-context markers (like @action:button, @option:check, etc) would > certainly remain. There is no technical reason to remove them, and they are > used much more than tags. E.g. in kdepim and kdepimlibs, 16.7% of all > messages have context markers, whereas 1.7% have text tags (6.4%/0.6% for > whole of "trunk"). In fact, context markers can be used as-is in any i18n > system with Gettext-like lookup key semantics. > > Is it sufficiently less bad now, or should I address your other points? :) > > Ah. Ok then.
No need to address my other points especially since they are already being discussed.