> On Sept. 6, 2012, 12:47 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > dolphin/src/dolphinpart.cpp, line 718
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106333/diff/1/?file=83835#file83835line718>
> >
> >     IMHO this is worse than a DolphinView::fileItemModel() method, because 
> > it will break at runtime rather than at compile time.
> 
> Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
>     Well, I doubt the Dolphin guys would allow the addition of such accessor 
> function to the public API of DolphinView. The reason why I am taking this 
> approach in the first place is because they did not like the idea of having 
> new signals added to KFileItemModel and DolphinView. See the discussion @ 
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106289/.

I know, and I'm telling them (and you) that either they'll have to accept an 
accessor (or signals), or you'll have to find another solution. A dynamic 
object retrieval is a *worse* solution than an accessor, I'm completely against 
it, it just makes things more fragile.

The equivalent, less fragile, solution would be a private accessor and making 
DolphinPart a friend. This way it's not public API that will get used 
elsewhere, but at least the compiler will tell us when it breaks again.


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106333/#review18625
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 5, 2012, 4:33 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106333/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 5, 2012, 4:33 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Dolphin and KDE Base Apps.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The following patch implements the new KParts listing notification extension 
> in Dolphin. This implementation does not add new signals to KFileItemModel 
> and DolphinView classes as the previous solution. Instead it relies on the 
> QObject's introspection to look for KDirLister and connect to the desired 
> signals. 
> 
> This solution is based on the "hack" that was originally implemented in the 
> directory listern plugin. However, unlike that implementation, this one will 
> not suffer from sudden and unexpected changes in Dolphin's code changes 
> because it is closer to the source and it looks for the directory lister 
> directly in KFileItemModel. This is something that cannot be done at the 
> plugin level because it would require the plugin to link against dolphin.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   dolphin/src/dolphinpart.h f9c0bbf 
>   dolphin/src/dolphinpart.cpp bf3d2a5 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106333/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dawit Alemayehu
> 
>

Reply via email to