> On June 24, 2013, 9:19 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > kdecore/services/kmimetype.cpp, line 316
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111050/diff/3/?file=165328#file165328line316>
> >
> >     I can't review this. It completely forks an existing method 
> > (findByUrlHelper), which is already supposed to have a fast path (not 
> > reading the contents of the file). So why not improve the existing method, 
> > rather than fork it? With this patch, I can't see what you changed compared 
> > to the original method, and what might possibly be missing (= regression).

Right, a very valid case. However considering the speedup has dropped down to 
just ~2x... and given the possibility's of possible regressions in dead code. 
I'm not keen on making a new patch.

If you think it's worth, I'll make a new one. If you think it's not then I'll 
discard this reviewrequest.


> On June 24, 2013, 9:19 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > kdecore/services/kmimetyperepository.cpp, line 594
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111050/diff/3/?file=165329#file165329line594>
> >
> >     This can't possibly be a speedup :-)
> >     
> >     In fact I don't see what the parsing of the globs file has to do with 
> > checking that the essential mimetypes exist (they typically don't have 
> > globs, even).

A leftover from previous patch versions.


- Mark


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111050/#review34953
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 23, 2013, 9:21 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111050/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 23, 2013, 9:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs, David Faure and Frank Reininghaus.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've recently seen Frank Reininghaus do his best in speeding up the rendering 
> in dolphin with regards to the app icons. And trying to prevent icon 
> flickering between "unknown" and the actual icon.
> 
> While reading his posts on the mailing list i was beginning to wonder: "is 
> fast mime detection actually fast"? While it was certainly faster then "slow" 
> mime detection, it still didn't really seem fast to me. A small benchmark app 
> hat ran fast mime detection in /usr/bin took ~40ms to complete. That's for 
> just 2656 items.
> 
> After quite a bit of profiling i managed to to bring the duration down from 
> ~40ms to ~3ms sometimes ~4ms. That's well over 10x faster.
> Mime detection by extension (like "file.tar.bz") is done as follows:
> 
> file.tar.bz
> Loop - find first dot
> - "tar.gz"
> if that matches a mime type then it's returned if it doesn't then it proceeds 
> on to the next dot:
> - next dot: "gz"
> if that matches.. return.
> Otherwise it will return the default mime type.
> 
> I am getting an inconsistency. Using the unpatched fast mime detection on a 
> file like: "test.tar.gz" gets detected as "application-x-compressed-tar" 
> where the patched version detects it as "application-gzip". The slow and 
> detailed mime detection detects the same file as 
> "application-x-compressed-tar". What should it be? application-gzip or 
> application-x-compressed-tar?
> 
> Note: This improved detection does expect folders to end with a "/". 
> Otherwise they will be detected as application-octet-stream (the default). 
> But i think this is common sense to let folders end with a "/". If any apps 
> that don't do that, they should fix it i suppose.
> 
> Best thing, it's all internal and private api change. No public function is 
> changed.
> 
> All feedback is welcome! If possible, i would like to put this in KDE 4.11.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kdecore/services/kmimetype.h bc35bcf 
>   kdecore/services/kmimetype.cpp d748523 
>   kdecore/services/kmimetyperepository.cpp f56f48e 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111050/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested this using just output comparison between the old version and the new 
> implementation. It works just fine.
> kurlmimetest output:
> ********* Start testing of KUrlMimeTest *********
> Config: Using QTest library 4.8.4, Qt 4.8.4
> PASS   : KUrlMimeTest::initTestCase()
> PASS   : KUrlMimeTest::testURLList()
> PASS   : KUrlMimeTest::testOneURL()
> PASS   : KUrlMimeTest::testFromQUrl()
> PASS   : KUrlMimeTest::testMostLocalUrlList()
> PASS   : KUrlMimeTest::cleanupTestCase()
> Totals: 6 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped
> ********* Finished testing of KUrlMimeTest *********
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark Gaiser
> 
>

Reply via email to