On Thursday 18 July 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > Hey, > > On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 22:03:51 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 July 2013, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > > On Monday 15 July 2013 14:42:14 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 18:57:41 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > > So the kde-workspace dudes decided they don't want a 4.12 release > > > > > and that they'll do a LTS 4.11, fine, how do we fix that branch > > > > > wise? > > > > > > > > After carefully reading everybody's opinion, I would like to make > > > > kde- > > > > > > > workspace master our KF5/Qt5 branch, for the following reasons: > > > +1, could we please get this going. The whole thread turned into quite > > > some bikeshedding which is disappointing. > > > > > > I think there is a very good suggestion with the CMake option to fail > > > the build. > > > > I must have missed that. > > > > Just the obvious that the cmake run of plasma needs to require a high > > enough version number of KF5 ? > > We require at least Qt 5.2, that should be satisfying this requirement, no? > (Anything Plasma can't reasonably build against Qt4, since we've moved to > QtQuick 2, and that is far from source compatible. (It's also the reason > why we need to start on this sooner rather than later, Plasma, compared to > other frameworks, requires more porting work. > > If the Qt 5.2 requirement is not enough, tell me what to do, and I'll do > it. KF5 is not versioned, but no worries,
Yes, that came to my mind the last days too. I guess it should be, shouldn't it ? I mean, currently everything is already "5.0.0". Should we set this back to 4.99.0, SOVERSION 5, or so ? > kde-workspace won't even build > on top of last weeks kdelibs[frameworks]. This is something that requires > a bit of adjustment, maybe reintroduce BIC/SIC Mondays again at some > point? I guess this will be more interesting than before once everything has been split into separate repositories... Alex