On 13.09.2014 21:34, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
I also see that I should have elaborated more. I had written more and removed it before sending the mail.
I just wanted to say thanks for a well thought-out reply - I didn't reply in turn because the discussion continued on the other fork, and it's probably best if we continue there now to avoid redundancy*. I think Ben's mail about reviewers using their judgement in whether to roll out a +2 (so that new contributors can hope- fully trust a +2 when they get one) and Sven's idea of maybe using different labels for the options to put everyone into the right state of responsibility read on the good points you raised. * = http://joeyh.name/blog/entry/thread_patterns/ is making me paranoid now.
Cheers Martin
Cheers, Eike
