On Monday 20 April 2015 20:17:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: [snip] > IMHO the duty of a distro is providing software to their users to use, if > the rules of the distro make providing software hard/impossible they need > to be updated or these distros need to understand they will lose users to > more flexible distros.
Let me begin that I acknowledge you have a fair point there. But using the same reasoning users can also switch to using other apps. I could also say that Fedora+Debian+Debian derivatives (Ubuntu is mostly in the same position as us) is also a large userbase for KDE to loose. But *it's not really* about which distro or app is going to loose more user base, it's about keeping the current one. I don't want Debian nor KDE to loose users, in the same way I do not want to ship something that's unmaintainable. So if any of us with with an upstream hat is going to code something, please consider that having a hard dependency on QtWebEngine might mean his/her code might not get available to everyone as it used to be, that's all. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.