El Dimarts, 4 de setembre de 2012, a les 19:00:40, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > El Dimarts, 4 de setembre de 2012, a les 18:44:27, Daniel Calviño Sánchez va > escriure: > > > So, well, I suppose that I'll change the license to GPLv2+. I'll have > > > to make a script or something, as there are 355 files to change > > > (including unit tests). I'll keep you informed ;) > > > > Done. I have changed all (or I think so) the GPLv3+ references to GPLv2+. > > > > But I have a question. In the project there are two tutorials made > > with KTutorial editor. In order to be accepted in KDE repositories, > > what license should I put those tutorials under? I ask this because > > KTutorial editor saves a tutorial in a XML file which is then exported > > to a Javascript file to be used with the application. But the tutorial > > itself can be seen as just documentation. So I don't know whether > > those tutorials should be licensed under GPLv2+ or GFDL 1.2+ (or even > > both, but I don't know if that is possible). > > I'd consider them more data than documentation so according to > http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy they can be
... and now i finish my email LGPL version 2.1 as listed in kdelibs/COPYING.LIB or later LGPL version 2.1, or version 3 or later versions approved by the membership of KDE e.V. BSD license as listed below. Ensure that the BSD license does not contain the so called 'advertisement clause'. MIT license as listed below. X11 license as listed below. GPL version 2 as listed in kdelibs/COPYING or later GPL version 2 or version 3 or later versions approved by the membership of KDE e.V. Cheers, Albert > > > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to > > >> unsubscribe > > >> << > >> > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe > >> << >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
