I thought so, thanks Andreas. On 14 March 2014 11:34, Andreas Hartmetz <ahartm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday 14 March 2014 07:13:16 Lindsay Mathieson wrote: >> Further to a question on kdepim - should nepomuk_file_indexer be running as >> well as baloo_file? >> >> Or is nepomuk_file_indexer obsolete? > > The Nepomuk indexer is obsolete if you are using Baloo, which is > intended to replace Nepomuk. > There is also a Baloo / Akonadi indexer agent, which you might not see > running because it's so fast :) > The file_indexer processes are both only for actual files AFAIK, not > Akonadi resources. The Akonadi indexers are called indexing agents > and have "agent" somewhere in their names. > There is or used to be (a recent commit should have fixed it) a bug > where even if your self-compiled KDE does not include Nepomuk, > something starts the Nepomuk / Akonadi agent that usually comes with > your distro packaging of KDE. > >>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
-- Lindsay >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
