Hi, >
> > On Sonntag, 18. Mai 2025 21:32:20 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Ingo Klöcker > wrote: > > > Yes, there is the theoretical threat that an AI learned code that's under a > > less liberal license like the GPL or even under one of the "new" not-OSI- > > approved licenses used by certain companies to prevent Amazon from selling > > services based on their code (or even proprietary code; for all we know, Co- > > Pilot was trained with the entire source code written by Microsoft), but > > that's only a problem if the AI cites this code literally so that we could > > be sued for plagiarizing. How realistic is this threat? > > > To turn this discussion into something positive: Maybe we should train our own > coding assistant AI(s) for Kate/KDevelop with code relevant for C++ and QML > which respects the licenses. We'd have an AI model for writing LGPL code that > was trained with KF and Qt source code (and other KDE code that's LGPL- > compatible) and we'd have a second AI model for writing GPL code that was > trained additionally with all of our GPL code. > > Kate would automatically use the correct model based on the SPDX license of > the current file. That would be a nice thing to have. That would at least make it a lot easier to decide that the derived code ends up with the right license. Greetings Christoph > > Regards, > Ingo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
