Ahoy ahoy I am proposing that we clarify the licensing policy a bit by adding a new point following cmake:
> #. Build-related files (build scripts, makefiles, build systems other than > cmake, …) should follow the cmake licensing rule. Use a permissive license, > so code can easily be shared. This is mostly to codify the intent behind the cmake rule and more broadly cover other build systems: we want to have a permissive license so code can be easily picked into other projects but at the same time leave enough wiggle room so we can use other licenses here e.g. if in a build system ecosystem the license of choice is MIT then we still want to be free to use MIT instead. I also considered changing around the cmake rule but I think we benefit from its assertiveness and clearity, with cmake being the dominant build system. Any objections? HS
