El dilluns, 2 de juny del 2025, a les 12:39:49 (Hora d’estiu d’Europa central), Harald Sitter va escriure: > Ahoy ahoy > > I am proposing that we clarify the licensing policy a bit by adding a > > new point following cmake: > > #. Build-related files (build scripts, makefiles, build systems other than > > cmake, …) should follow the cmake licensing rule. Use a permissive > > license, so code can easily be shared. > This is mostly to codify the intent behind the cmake rule and more > broadly cover other build systems: we want to have a permissive > license so code can be easily picked into other projects but at the > same time leave enough wiggle room so we can use other licenses here > e.g. if in a build system ecosystem the license of choice is MIT then > we still want to be free to use MIT instead. > > I also considered changing around the cmake rule but I think we > benefit from its assertiveness and clearity, with cmake being the > dominant build system.
I don't particularly agree that "Use a permissive license" is "clear". Where do i find a list of such licenses? I would really welcome a list we accept even if it's very long. Cheers, Albert P.S: I guess this would cover my Apache 2 for oss-fuzz build scripts request? > Any objections? > > HS
