Hi,
On Sunday, December 28th, 2025 at 01:29, Justin Zobel <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28/12/25 08:50, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El dissabte, 27 de desembre del 2025, a les 22:18:55 (Hora estàndard > > d’Europa > > central), Christoph Cullmann va escriure: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > given we soon start 2026: Would it be time to sunset the Qt 5 stuff on > > > invent? > > > > In July we said it would be in September and there was not a huge uproar, so > > doing it in January 2026 (6 months later than what we said) should be more > > than enough. > > > > Doing it == "closing the remaining Qt5 CI" and that's it i guess? > > > > Or is there something else that needs to be removed? > > > > Cheers, > > Albert > > > > > (beside the Qt patch collection) > > > > > > Greetings > > > Christoph > > > > > > On Thursday, July 3rd, 2025 at 21:33, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > El dijous, 3 de juliol del 2025, a les 16:52:49 (Hora d’estiu d’Europa > > > > > > > > central), Neal Gompa va escriure: > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 6:31 PM Albert Astals Cid [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While this has been discussed in various forums, it has not yet been > > > > > > the > > > > > > main focus of any conversation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are planning to drop support for Qt5 CI on invent.kde.org at the > > > > > > end of > > > > > > September 2025. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are still using Qt5 you have 3 months to move to Qt6 or you > > > > > > can > > > > > > try > > > > > > to convince the powers that you need more time with a really good > > > > > > reason. > > > > > > Does this mean we've effectively stopped working on the Qt5 patch > > > > > > collection and we're going to EOL the 24.08-qt5 runtime for Flatpak > > > > > > in > > > > > > September? > > > > > > > > We do not have CI for the patch collection. > > > > > > > > > > > > I will [try to[ continue doing the rebases for the patch-collection > > > > until > > > > Qt 5.15.19 gets released next year. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Albert > > What are others thoughts on archiving any project that has not been ported to > Qt6 or active Qt6 Merge Request / Branch? > > Unarchiving projects is always possible, and the source code remains > available for people to check out read-only and work on. If they start > working on a port, they can request the project be unarchived. I think one should first collect a list of stuff that might be affected and then one can discuss that, e.g. in https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/repo-metadata/-/issues/23 Greetings Christoph
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
