-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On April 3, 2002 15:47, Ryan Cumming wrote: > If this captialization is no longer the preferred style, I -strongly- > suggest that you update the styleguide to reflect that change.
Assuming that some person or some group decided to change the preferred capitialization guidelines without updating the styleguide, why? The vast majority of KDE applications were already conforming to styleguide captialization. For instance, I could only find one flaw in all of KMail. In many cases, a dialog was using styleguide-style capitialization everywhere, with the exception of one or two widgets. It would be an unimaginably vast task to convert all of KDE to another style. Is there any usability or translation benefit to using book title capitialization everywhere that I'm not aware of? - -Ryan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8q58yLGMzRzbJfbQRAmQEAJ9s3hDGQ23jQBI6hn4694UZMMsikACdFZ5u IJO7tJHii93h86ZEQwY94aM= =cF9C -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
