On Thursday 28 July 2005 19:06, obennett wrote: > On Thursday 28 July 2005 11:38, Francis Giannaros wrote: > > > There's no reason those apps that are being maintained in extragears > > > can't have entities in general.entities > > > > > > The only consideration is that the apps themselves may not want to > > > additionally define it in their own doc, so that they are not dependent > > > on a current version of kdelibs. > > > > > > For this specific example, amaroK and Konversation are very popular, > > > integrate with other KDE apps, and are likely to be mentioned in other > > > docs (the user guide, for instance) so putting those two in kdelibs > > > would be a good idea. > > > > Right. I've attached a patch with the entities which I think (at least) > > should go in: amarok, konversation, digikam, superkaramba, ubuntu and > > kubuntu. > > spelt konversation wrong :-) > also kubuntu and ubuntu aren't "apps".
Eeek. I should be a lot more careful (I'll try to be), sorry about that, and thanks. Re-did, re-attached. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: general.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 2407 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20050728/d10ec1da/attachment.bin
