On Friday, January 24, 2014 07:22:22 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:47:45 Valentin Rusu wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:48:00 PM Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > On Wednesday 22 January 2014 22:21:47 Valentin Rusu wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > attica seems to have been absorbed as a framework, but does not > > > > > appear > > > > > to have been assigned a tier. Based on its dependencies, it looks > > > > > like > > > > > it would fit in tier 1? > > > > > > > > > > kwallet is in tier 2, but since > > > > > b60582640d99e0ef603bf4e02df974793fb5ad27 > > > > > it includes kwalletd which depends on higher tier frameworks - does > > > > > it > > > > > still belong in tier 2? > > > > > > > > kwallet-framework is still tier2, as there are no higher dependencies, > > > > AFAIK. > > > > > > If it depends on anything else which is not in Qt or tier 1, it > > > automatically becomes tier 3. It can't depend on anything which is tier > > > 2. > > > > OK, then it's tier3 :-) > > Please make sure http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List is up to date > then.
Done. Also updated kde-build-metadata (minor change). > > Cheers. -- Valentin Rusu irc: valir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel