On Friday 24 January 2014 20:33:14 Valentin Rusu wrote: > On Saturday, January 25, 2014 01:49:51 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > > On 01/24/2014 09:21 AM, Alex Merry wrote: > > > On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote: > > >> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote: > > >>> On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > > >>>> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote: > > >>> Sure, the framework itself is still tier 2...but the repo also > > >>> includes > > >>> kwalletd which definitely is not tier 2, and there does not appear to > > >>> be > > >>> any option to control building them independently. > > >> > > >> I'll add that option asap. > > > > > > Is that useful? Would anyone have any use for the library without the > > > daemon? > > Once, David F. told on this mailing list that such an option would let an Qt > application compile against KF5Walllet. The daemon is a runtime dependency.
I can't remember if I said that, and if so what I had in mind. Compiling against a crippled framework and then missing the daemon for it to work at runtime sounds a bit strange. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
