> On Jan. 31, 2014, 6:21 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: > > If this review is obsolete, can you discard it, please? > > David Narváez wrote: > I'm waiting for an answer to my question above.
I would go with Luigi's suggestion. If we determine later that it might be useful beyond KDocTools, we can revisit it then. - Alex ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/#review48693 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m., David Narváez wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 1:16 p.m.) > > > Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano. > > > Repository: kdoctools > > > Description > ------- > > Part of the overall task of removing mentions of KDE4 from the code. > > > Diffs > ----- > > KF5DocToolsMacros.cmake 191a2c5 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115077/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > David Narváez > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
