> On Feb. 9, 2014, 7:12 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > This is not something I'd give a green light for.
> > 
> > ActivityManager/KF5 is a drop-in replacement for the current one. They 
> > should *not* be installed side-by-side.
> > 
> >

kactivitymanagerd might be drop in, but the rest of the framework is not. Any 
consumers that are not ported to KF5 will need to be dropped by packagers if 
it's not coinstallable.


- Michael


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/#review49377
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić.
> 
> 
> Repository: kactivities
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> ...so it can co-exists with kactivities4 in the same prefix
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/lib/core/manager_p.cpp 57f60be 
>   src/service/CMakeLists.txt 348f8a3 
>   src/service/files/kactivitymanagerd.desktop ce68a49 
>   tests/core/Process.cpp b6279d0 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Both Plasma1 and Next ran fine with this patch and withouth 
> kactivitymanagerd(4) installed. Haven't tested the case when they are both 
> installed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hrvoje Senjan
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to