> On Feb. 21, 2014, 6:29 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > I understand Ivan point of view. Now I'm wondering about something: Are we > > sure the situation will be the same in the future for a 5 to 6 transition? > > I don't think we can be 100% sure and so we might want to start versioning > > to be ready for that and be consistent with other similar services. > > > > I wouldn't have a huge problem either way, just want to make sure we > > thought that through. > > Ivan Čukić wrote: > KAMD keeps back-compatibility. Even in 5 -> 6 transition, I will want > that kept. > > I still don't see a point in having two different binaries that can not > be run at the same time (unlike kded, for example) and where interchanging > which one was started can lead to fun things. It would have even worse > consequences if those were able to be run at the same time, and use different > dbus paths. > > And to reiterate, if distributions want to include this patch, and deal > with the resulting problems themselves, I'm fine with that.* > > (btw, kamd/5 is more stable than kamd/4) > > * I guess it will bring me headaches, while triaging bug reports, but > that I can handle (I hope :) ) >
OK, let's discard it then. - Kevin ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/#review50434 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 18, 2014, 9:50 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 9:50 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić. > > > Repository: kactivities > > > Description > ------- > > ...so it can co-exists with kactivities4 in the same prefix > > > Diffs > ----- > > autotests/Process.cpp a7a0507 > src/lib/core/manager_p.cpp 57f60be > src/service/CMakeLists.txt 141e9b7 > src/service/files/kactivitymanagerd.desktop ce68a49 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Both Plasma1 and Next ran fine with this patch and withouth > kactivitymanagerd(4) installed. Haven't tested the case when they are both > installed. > > > Thanks, > > Hrvoje Senjan > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
