Hi,
from the discussion it appears that the intention is to provide a
generic stable branch that isn't inherently specific to Kubtuntu,
Kubuntu Focus, or Techpaladin. This matches the development for Plasma
and Gear.
With this in mind I have no objections, and would suggest to use
Frameworks/6.24 as branch name.
There's one question that needs figuring out though: Should the branch
be enabled for translations? Technically that shouldn't be much of a
problem, but it's worth discussing whether this is a good use of
translators time and energy.
Cheers
Nico
On 5/18/26 5:44 PM, Nate Graham wrote:
To help move this forward, are there any formal objections to
Techpaladin people (Marco, me, possibly others) creating stable
branches for frameworks that we would maintain by backporting
bug-fixes already on master to, and making releases from those
branches as needed?
Nate
On 5/14/26 10:44 AM, Nate Graham wrote:
On 5/14/26 10:38 AM, Allen Winter wrote:
not sure if this is clear: you'll fix the bugs in the master
branches and backport those fixes to the current release branch and
to the LTS branch?
and you won't add new features as this is only about fixing bugs?
That's correct. This effort is about backporting public bug fixes
already on master, not doing private feature development.
Plasma and Gear already have stable branches that can be used for
this; the discussion here is really mostly about creating such a
thing for a specific Frameworks release so the same thing can be done
for it.
Nate
