On Friday 25 of April 2014 15:43:39 Marco Martin wrote: > On Friday 25 April 2014 15:24:50 Luigi Toscano wrote: > > On Friday 25 of April 2014 15:14:46 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > > Moving plasma-framework to frameworks means that we will loose > > > flexibility > > > since we won't be able to break api/abi. > > > > > > So, do we really have to move it there? Imho would be prudent to keep it > > > somewhere else where api/abi stability is not mandatory. > > > > > > Also, right now there is only one user of this framework > > > (plasma-desktop), > > > I would wait until at least we have 2 more shells based on it to commit > > > to any stability. > > > > Wasn't/isn't libplasma supposed to be used also by other applications > > (amarok was the main user I guess)? > > It always was. > wether they want to use it or not it's their problem > > and this attitude of "pest dependency" deeply bothers me and makes me not > much really motivated to keep working on it. > > yes, it has a lot of dependencies and is not optimal. > f i would have it primarly as ligthtweight libraries i would split it at > lest in 3-4 parts, but i think it's better preventing the fragmentation of > little libraries in this case
No, no, I was not talking against 3rd-party usage - it's just another point for API and ABI stability :) Ciao -- Luigi _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel