-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#review61935
-----------------------------------------------------------


I know i'm late, but if CMake provides one, can't we just kill ours?

- Albert Astals Cid


On jul. 7, 2014, 5:27 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated jul. 7, 2014, 5:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdelibs4support
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This version will accept the old GETTEXT_PROCESS_PO_FILES() syntax (no
> PO_FILES argument), but will also accept the new syntax required by
> CMake's version of this file. It will also warn when PO_FILES is not
> given.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake 91e88f7e00ac52539066e71eeffb7df6c2148196 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> None whatsoever: Jonathan, you know where this isssue has been seen, can you 
> test?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex Merry
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to