> On May 15, 2016, 8:03 p.m., Kåre Särs wrote:
> > Looks good :) A couple of questions:
> > 
> > - If we create the .rcc do we also want to install the icons?
> > - I creates a similar solution for Kate on Windows (in a separate repo), 
> > but I needed to add a program to replace the symlinked files with aliases 
> > in the .qrc as symlinks do not work properly on windows. Are you interested 
> > in adding a similar program/script/... to do the same directly in 
> > breeze-icons.git? My application is in 
> > git://anongit.kde.org/scratch/sars/kate-windows.git (icon-rcc)
> 
> Gleb Popov wrote:
>     > If we create the .rcc do we also want to install the icons?
>     
>     No idea, to be honest.
>     
>     > I creates a similar solution for Kate on Windows (in a separate repo), 
> but I needed to add a program to replace the symlinked files with aliases in 
> the .qrc as symlinks do not work properly on windows
>     
>     Sorry, what symlinks? I saw some symlinks stuff in autotests, but didn't 
> get what it is all about.
> 
> Kåre Särs wrote:
>     Quite a lot of icons in breeze-icons are just symbolic links to other 
> icons in the repository. On Linux/OSX/Android/... this is not a problem, but 
> on Windows, where you don't have proper symbolic links, git just creates a 
> text file with the path to the target file. With those text files you just 
> don't get an icon :( So my solution was to create an application to modify 
> the .qrc file add an alias to the target file in stead of using the symbolic 
> link file directly.
>     
>     Don't let this comment be in the way of committing this RR :)

I've got an idea how to handle symlinked files. First, run

    git ls-files -s
    
and get a list of symlinked files (mode 120000), then read their contents, find 
out the real file, and overwrite symlink with it.
Finally, run

    git update-index --assume-unchanged
    
for each updated symlink and here we go.

This can be implemented as CMake script, the only question is when to run it? 
As part of CMake configuration step, or let it be a part of a target?
What do you think about this?


- Gleb


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127911/#review95485
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 17, 2016, 11:28 a.m., Gleb Popov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127911/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 17, 2016, 11:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: breeze-icons
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I copied icons into the binary dir, because i haven't found a way to generate 
> rcc without polluting source dir.
> 
> Not sure if installation dir is right, too.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 2147705 
>   icons-dark/CMakeLists.txt 36d37f1 
>   icons/CMakeLists.txt 5ded49c 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127911/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gleb Popov
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to