> On Feb. 5, 2017, 10:45 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Patch looks ok to me, although I don't know much about all this.
> > 
> > The real problem isn't tooling, but lack of active maintainership for 
> > kfilemetadata. Are you interested in taking over?

Hello,

I have a real interest in kfilemetadata as I am using it in my audio player. 
Still, I am not sure I have enough time for it. Not sure I would be able to do 
better than the current situation.

What do you think ?


- Matthieu


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129798/#review102399
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 15, 2017, 4:03 p.m., Matthieu Gallien wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129798/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 15, 2017, 4:03 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Baloo and KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kfilemetadata
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Musepack extraction of album artist was using the wrong tag name (tested
> against easytag and picard).
> 
> See also this page (http://taglib.org/api/classTagLib_1_1APE_1_1Tag.html) 
> that seems to indicate that APE is using "ALBUM ARTIST" with a space between 
> both words.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   autotests/samplefiles/test.flac PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/samplefiles/test.m4a PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/samplefiles/test.mp3 PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/samplefiles/test.mpc PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/samplefiles/test.ogg PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/taglibextractortest.cpp d46e49e 
>   src/extractors/taglibextractor.cpp 8fcad93 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129798/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I have tested with automatic tests of KFileMetaData and also the encoding 
> problem in Musepack format against Easytag and Picard applications.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matthieu Gallien
> 
>

Reply via email to