ltoscano added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> dfaure wrote in kprotocolmanager.cpp:846 > How about just KIO ? > > kio_http is unnecessarily specific IMHO. It's all of KIO/5.33 that ends up > making up the http client. Ack > dfaure wrote in cache.cpp:109 > Memory? that seems wrong (or at least misleading) to me. The kio_http cache > is on disk, not in RAM. Right, I simply fixed the Konqueror part but I did not read the whole sentence. REPOSITORY R241 KIO REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D5090 To: ltoscano, dfaure Cc: aacid, lueck, #frameworks
