rkflx added a comment.

  In D12327#250761 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D12327#250761>, 
@elvisangelaccio wrote:
  
  > I'm not sure I agree with this change
  
  
  At least it's not a -1 yet, so maybe we can convince you once everything is 
in place…!?
  
  > afaik Windows does not show the tree view by default in its file dialogs 
(unless you are referring to `FolderBrowserDialog` from .Net)
  
  Testing Internet Explorer, Paint and Notepad, all show this detailed view 
(Explorer too!). Only when switching to the Pictures folder the view is changed 
to "text under icons". For a non-Microsoft app I tested Firefox, which also has 
detailed view. If you asked me, I'd say that's the default experience people 
get on Windows.
  
  Nevertheless, copying Windows is not the main point. We should switch 
defaults if we determine it's the best for KDE's apps. Reasons for that might 
be:
  
  - Vertical scrolling is awkward, often people don't realize they can use 
their scroll wheel or touchpad and resort to move the scrollbar instead.
  - Continuously reading and scrolling a vertical list may allow finding a file 
faster than jumping back and forth in the vertical-and-horizontal placement 
with more horizontal scrolling in between.
  - Sorting is more natural, with quicker access (thus used more often) to 
toggle between time and name based sorting.
  - Clear separation between the details mode and the more visual Simple View. 
We cannot turn on "text under icons", a bigger icon size and thumbnails if 
Simple View was to stay the default mode, because that would not work well for 
the general use case and show too view items at once.
  
  @ngraham Anything I missed?
  
  As a sort of compromise we could keep the current default, but add a third 
button like in Dolphin. That needs more space, has some caveats and is more 
complicated to implement, though. Food for thought.

REPOSITORY
  R241 KIO

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D12327

To: ngraham, #frameworks, #vdg, rkflx
Cc: elvisangelaccio, abetts, #frameworks, michaelh, bruns

Reply via email to