smithjd added a comment.
What was wrong with https://phabricator.kde.org/D15583?id=42018 ? > I could see the case for allowing this behavior to be explicitly overridden by an advanced user who marks ~/foo/ as excluded and then later marks ~foo/bar/ as included, but that would be material for another patch I think. This is actually already how this works, the excludes and includes are both resolved into either an index path or do not index path outcome. REPOSITORY R293 Baloo REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D15583 To: ngraham, #baloo, #dolphin, bruns, #frameworks Cc: smithjd, anthonyfieroni, kde-frameworks-devel, ashaposhnikov, michaelh, astippich, spoorun, ngraham, bruns, abrahams
