smithjd added a comment.

  What was wrong with ?
  > I could see the case for allowing this behavior to be explicitly overridden 
by an advanced user who marks ~/foo/ as excluded and then later marks ~foo/bar/ 
as included, but that would be material for another patch I think.
  This is actually already how this works, the excludes and includes are both 
resolved into either an index path or do not index path outcome.

  R293 Baloo


To: ngraham, #baloo, #dolphin, bruns, #frameworks
Cc: smithjd, anthonyfieroni, kde-frameworks-devel, ashaposhnikov, michaelh, 
astippich, spoorun, ngraham, bruns, abrahams

Reply via email to