* Andy Fawcett [2008-02-15 15:17]: > > If it is possible i would vote for the (include|lib|bin)/kde3 > > solution. But /usr/local/kde3 would be ok too. > > I think we need to do this, to make life easier in the long run. > > The one thing that concerns me is that we do have users who don't start KDE > from kdm scripts, or even run a KdE desktop at all. Having the binaries in a > non-standard path (either KDE3 or 4) is going to cause them problems.
Indeed. But if we want have both in /usr/local/bin we have to add 3 or 4 to the binary names. > If we can have /usr/local/bin for both, and /usr/local/include/kde(3| > 4) /usr/local/lib/kde(3|4) etc, I think that's probably for the best. I'll > admit I have no current idea if this will work, but I have a week free to > help towards any solution. > > I'd also do same with Qt3 and 4, while we're at it. I think there is currently no problem with Qt 3 vs. 4. I don't think we need to change anything. BTW, another thing we might want to pursue during the 3.5.9 upgrade is a consolidation of bsd.kde.mk. E.g. - Remove the "CVS" bits. I think they aren't used for anything at the moment. - Move the QT3 stuff to bsd.qt.mk. Comments? _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
