On Friday 15 February 2008 06:18:25 am Andy Fawcett wrote: > On Friday 15 February 2008 15:38:28 Tilman Linneweh wrote: > > If it is possible i would vote for the (include|lib|bin)/kde3 solution. > > But /usr/local/kde3 would be ok too. > > I think we need to do this, to make life easier in the long run.
Ditto. I prefer the /usr/local/kde3 solution, as most Linux distros do something similar with /usr/kde3 or /opt/kde3. Thus there's more support for it. > The one thing that concerns me is that we do have users who don't start KDE > from kdm scripts, or even run a KdE desktop at all. Having the binaries in > a non-standard path (either KDE3 or 4) is going to cause them problems. There will be a crapload of binaries with the same name. Renaming them all will be a major pain. But perhaps rename just startkde. Or put a kde[34].sh under /usr/local/et c. I will have almost no time to work on anything for a couple of weeks. -- David Johnson _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
