Doug Barton <[email protected]> writes: > On 04/17/2011 14:24, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > >> All the qt4 dependencies are really required, even phonon, as you can >> configure your Qt-related phonon settings via qtconfig. > > It sounds like you're saying that qtconfig must have phonon stuff > available at compile time because it contains code that is not > optional that allows you to configure phonon. If so, thank you for the > explanation, however it turns out that is not correct.
You are right, sorry. qtconfig's code only builds the Phonon-related parts if Phonon is present. [snip] > So this argues pretty strongly for an OPTION in qtconfig to add phonon > support via those 3 items above. Probably reasonable to default it to > on in order to match the status quo. I agree. I've never worked directly on the qt4-* ports, so I think it is safe to wait for someone else who has to express his opinion here. > While you're at it, it would be nice to have an OPTION to remove > qt3support. That module took quite a while to build, and is completely > useless for me (and I'd imagine most users as well). Do you mean an OPTION in the qt4-qtconfig port itself? If so, I'm afraid it's not possible, as qtconfig's code still uses some qt3-compatibility bits from qt3support. _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
