On 04/17/2011 20:32, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Doug Barton<[email protected]> writes: > >> On 04/17/2011 14:24, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: >> >>> All the qt4 dependencies are really required, even phonon, as you can >>> configure your Qt-related phonon settings via qtconfig. >> >> It sounds like you're saying that qtconfig must have phonon stuff >> available at compile time because it contains code that is not >> optional that allows you to configure phonon. If so, thank you for the >> explanation, however it turns out that is not correct. > > You are right, sorry. qtconfig's code only builds the Phonon-related > parts if Phonon is present. > > [snip] > >> So this argues pretty strongly for an OPTION in qtconfig to add phonon >> support via those 3 items above. Probably reasonable to default it to >> on in order to match the status quo. > > I agree. I've never worked directly on the qt4-* ports, so I think it is > safe to wait for someone else who has to express his opinion here.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156462 >> While you're at it, it would be nice to have an OPTION to remove >> qt3support. That module took quite a while to build, and is completely >> useless for me (and I'd imagine most users as well). > > Do you mean an OPTION in the qt4-qtconfig port itself? If so, I'm afraid > it's not possible, as qtconfig's code still uses some qt3-compatibility > bits from qt3support. It would likely take a little bit of patching, yes. But no one said it was going to be easy. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
